Most people are not narcissists. But the puzzle cleverly exposes a common human behavior: the impulse to protect one’s ego when challenged, even in trivial circumstances.
Cognitive Bias at Work
The differences in square counts are also a lesson in cognitive bias:
Confirmation bias: Once you see a number that “feels right,” you are inclined to stick with it, discounting evidence that suggests otherwise.
Anchoring: Your first impression sets a mental anchor, making it difficult to adjust your count after seeing additional information.
Selective attention: You see what seems relevant first, ignoring less obvious details.
These biases, while adaptive in daily life, can mislead you in puzzles. They show how perception and decision-making are intertwined, influenced by prior expectations, context, and even emotional responses.
Counting Methods Explained
To illustrate, let’s imagine a simplified puzzle: a 3×3 stack of squares, arranged in layers.
Scenario 1: Top-facing squares only
You see 9 squares on the top layer.
Total count = 9.
Scenario 2: Top-facing + front-facing
Top layer = 9
Middle layer (partially visible fronts) = 4
Bottom layer (corners visible) = 1
Total count = 14
Scenario 3: Total squares including hidden
Top = 9
Middle = 9
Bottom = 9
Total = 27
Depending on your approach, the answer varies dramatically. And most people do not pause to specify which definition they are using, which explains why arguments escalate in comment threads.
Read more by clicking the (NEXT) button below!
Leave a Comment